@ISIDEWITHQuestions社会问题12yrs ago

你对人工流产的看法是什么？

流产是导致人类怀孕胎儿和死亡的终止医疗过程。堕胎被禁止在美国30个州，直到罗伊诉韦德案1973年最高法院的裁决。这项裁决作出堕胎的法律在所有50个州，但给他们的监管权力时，可以怀孕期间进行堕胎过。目前，所有国家都必须在怀孕早期流产允许，但可能会禁止他们在其后6个月。

75%
支持人工流产
25%
反对人工流产
37%
支持人工流产
25%
反对人工流产
37%
主张堕胎合法，提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量
0%
反对堕胎，我还反对强奸和乱伦的受害者堕胎
0%
主张自由选择，但禁止在怀孕三个月后堕胎
0%
反对堕胎，但是如果是强奸、乱伦或者对母亲和孩子有危险则应该允许
0%
堕胎权合法，我不同意但是政府没有权利禁止

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Abortion” has changed over time for 8 United Arab Emirates voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Abortion” has changed over time for 8 United Arab Emirates voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from United Arab Emirates users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Abortion” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W

The Battle Over Abortion Rights Takes Center Stage in State Elections and Ballot Initiatives

As the United States gears up for a series of pivotal elections and ballot initiatives, the issue of abortion rights has emerged as a central battleground, with states taking divergent paths in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to leave abortion regulation up to individual states. From Florida to Colorado and Arizona, voters are being faced with amendments and legislative proposals that could significantly alter access to abortion services in their states. In Florida, an abortion-rights amendment is struggling to gain the necessary support, indicating a deeply divided electorate on this contentious issue. Meanwhile, Colorado's Proposition 89, which seeks to enshrine abortion access in the state's constitution, has sparked fierce opposition from anti-abortion activists, highlighting the polarized nature of the debate.In Arizona, political dynamics are shifting as Republicans, who once championed stringent abortion bans, are now reconsidering their stance in light of potential ballot measures and public opinion. The state's abortion policies are under scrutiny, with some GOP members advocating for more moderate restrictions in an attempt to find common ground with voters. This recalibration reflects the complex interplay between political strategy and the deeply personal convictions that drive the abortion debate.The implications of these state-level battles extend far beyond the immediate policy outcomes. They are indicative of a broader national struggle over reproductive rights, with potential consequences for the 2024 presidential election and beyond. As candidates and parties navigate the treacherous waters of abortion politics, they are forced to confront not only the legal and ethical dimensions of the issue but also the strategic calculations that could determine their electoral fortunes.The unfolding drama over abortion rights in the United States underscores the profound impact of the Supreme Court's decision to decentralize the issue. As states chart their own courses, the patchwork of policies that emerges will likely fuel ongoing debates and legal challenges. For voters, the stakes are high, as the outcome of these elections and ballot initiatives will shape the landscape of reproductive rights for years to come, making the issue of abortion not just a matter of personal belief but a pivotal factor in the nation's political trajectory.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W

Trump's Abortion Stance Sparks Controversy and Criticism

The debate over abortion rights in the United States has once again surged to the forefront of political discourse, this time focusing on former President Donald Trump's recent statements and actions. Trump, who has historically aligned himself with anti-abortion stances, particularly during his presidency, has made headlines with his latest comments on the issue, prompting a mix of criticism and support. Critics argue that Trump's position on abortion is not only politically motivated but also a strategic move to solidify his base ahead of potential future electoral campaigns. This assertion is supported by his actions while in office, which included appointing conservative judges believed to be sympathetic to anti-abortion laws.The controversy was further fueled when Trump lashed out at his former Vice President, Mike Pence, for criticizing his abortion statement. Trump's reaction, shared on his social media platform Truth Social, accused Pence of being influenced by his advisers and critiqued his polling numbers, showcasing the deepening rift between the two former allies over this divisive issue. Supporters of Trump argue that his stance on abortion, while politically convenient, aligns with conservative values and principles, defending his right to revise his position as a reflection of political strategy rather than a flip-flop on moral grounds.The public discourse around Trump's abortion stance highlights the broader national debate over reproductive rights in the United States. As political figures and parties position themselves on either side of this contentious issue, the American public is left to navigate the complex landscape of political rhetoric, legal battles, and the ongoing fight for or against abortion rights. Trump's recent comments and the backlash they have received underscore the polarized nature of abortion politics in America and signal that this issue will remain a central topic in the nation's political arena.As the country moves closer to another election cycle, the debate over abortion rights and Trump's position on the matter will likely continue to evoke strong reactions from both supporters and critics. The implications of this debate extend beyond the political sphere, affecting legal, social, and ethical discussions across the nation. Observers suggest that the key to understanding Trump's stance on abortion—and its impact on American politics—is to watch his actions and the policies he supports, rather than focusing solely on his words.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to United Arab Emirates voters.