Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHAnswersPolitical Ideology1yr ago

Syndicalism

You believe in a society where workers collectively own and manage industries, leading to a more equitable distribution of wealth and power.

Syndicalism is a political ideology that advocates for workers' self-management and the establishment of a society in which industries are owned and managed by the workers who operate them. It is a branch of socialism that focuses on the labor movement. Syndicalists believe that the state and capitalism should be abolished by a general strike, leading to a society where workers are directly in control of the means of production and distribution.

The roots of syndicalism can be traced back to the early 19th century with the rise of industrialization and the labor movement. However…  

Read more

196 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Do you think a society run by workers would be fairer than our current system; why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

Can you think of a time when being heard in a group decision made you feel empowered, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

Have you ever experienced the benefits of collective problem-solving, and what were they?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

In what way would having control over your work environment change how you view responsibility?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

Would you prefer to work in an environment where your pay was linked to collective performance, and why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

Could a society that emphasizes worker collaboration over competition better address social inequalities; how so?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

Imagine a company where you could directly allocate resources - where would you prioritize investment and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would you feel working in a place where you and your coworkers had full control over the decisions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What changes would you implement if you had the power to decide in your current or future job?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How do you think the concept of fairness would change if workers managed their industries?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If there were no CEOs or upper management, do you believe companies would be more or less successful?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

In what ways do you think syndicalism could impact job satisfaction and motivation?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Could a society function well if all industries were worker-managed, and what might be some challenges?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How would you handle conflict in a group where everyone is equal and there's no designated leader?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

What skills do you think are necessary to successfully collaborate with others in making important decisions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How important is it to have a say in the rules that govern your school or workplace, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

If you could design your ideal work environment, what role would equality play?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

What kind of social issues do you think could be improved if more people practiced collective decision-making?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

If all jobs paid the same, how would you choose your career and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How would you persuade someone who believes in traditional business hierarchy to consider a worker's cooperative model?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How can the principle of solidarity in collaborative movements impact society at large?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

How does the idea of taking collective ownership over your school environment resonate with you, and what changes would you make?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Imagine a future where your contributions at work directly shape your lifestyle; what's the first thing you'd want to influence?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…12mos12MO

Can you share a time when you had to compromise for the greater good; how did it make you feel?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would the absence of a traditional corporate hierarchy impact your motivation to work?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Would you trust your colleagues to make important business decisions, and why or why not?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If there were no state or capitalist structure, how do you feel the world would address the individual's ambition and the desire for personal success?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

How would you feel if success at your job directly improved the lives of your co-workers and community?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

If you could vote on your company's important decisions, what would be the first thing you'd want to change and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

How might being a part-owner of your workplace affect your daily attitude towards your job?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

What skill sets do you think are most important for successful collaboration in a worker-controlled environment?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

How would everyday work-life improve if everyone had an equal stake in the outcome of their labor?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…11mos11MO

How do you envision resolving conflicts within a worker-run business without traditional management?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…9mos9MO

If you could collaborate on a class project with no leader, what strategies would you use to organize the team?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…9mos9MO

How might your sense of job security change if you were also part-owner of your workplace?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How might the values of mutual aid and cooperation manifest in your day-to-day life if applied beyond the workplace?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

Can you think of a time when collaborative efforts led to better results than individual work, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How would your perspective on work change if your voice had the same weight as your manager's in decision-making?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How do you think the quality of products and services would change if the workers producing them had full control?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

What does 'success' mean to you in a world where your work benefits both you and your communal environment?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

If you could create a community project without hierarchy, what would it be, and who would benefit most from it?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How would your daily routine change if you knew your actions at work impacted not just your salary but the wellbeing of your co-workers as well?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

What kind of project would you be passionate about if you had the chance to collaborate as an equal with your classmates or colleagues?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

Imagine you’re part of a team where everyone's role is fluid and adaptable; how would you navigate your contributions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How would the absence of a competition-focused ranking system at school or work change your approach to success?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…10mos10MO

How do you envision a typical meeting where every employee's input could steer the company's decisions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…9mos9MO

If you had a say in how your workplace's profits were reinvested, what would be your top priority?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…9mos9MO

Can you describe how your sense of purpose at work might change if it operated under a cooperative model?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How would you feel working in a place where you and your coworkers had full control over the decisions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Imagine a future where your contributions at work directly shape your lifestyle; what's the first thing you'd want to influence?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

What changes would you implement if you had the power to decide in your current or future job?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

What kind of project would you be passionate about if you had the chance to collaborate as an equal with your classmates or colleagues?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Do you think a society run by workers would be fairer than our current system; why or why not?

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

No One’s Safe: Trump’s ‘Border Czar’ Homan Promises Sweeping Deportation Operation

TOM COTTON is slated to be the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, putting “I think mass deportation is just talk, but the era of open borders will be over,” Scott McConnell, a co-founder of The American Conservative, wrote on X. In July a Mexican-born Trump backer told The Times, “Last time, he didn’t even finish the wall. What’s he going to do this time?”Now the answer is taking shape: He’s going to oversee a militarized mass roundup of the undocumented. On Sunday, Trump named Tom Homan, his former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as “border czar.”In a speech to this year’s National Conservatism Conference, Homan, who oversaw Trump’s family separation policy, promised a “historic deportation operation” from which no undocumented immigrant would be safe. “No one’s off the table in the next administration,” he said. “If you’re here illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.”Then, on Monday, Trump named the obsessively anti-immigrant Stephen Miller as his deputy chief of staff. Miller’s portfolio, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan reported in The Times, “is expected to be vast and to far exceed what the eventual title will convey.” Miller has been forthright about his desire to purge immigrants here illegally, as well as many here legally, from the United States.Among other things, Miller has said that Trump would cancel the temporary protected status of thousands of Afghans who fled here after the Taliban’s takeover and take another stab at ending DACA, the program that protects from deportation some immigrants brought to the United States as children.Most significantly, he’s laid out plans to use National Guard troops to help arrest migrants en masse, warehousing them in military camps while they await deportation. No one should be shocked when this happens. I suspect some will be anyway.

▲  2811 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

A New Era for Crypto? Trump’s Transition Team Considers Robinhood Exec for SEC Chair

Trump transition team officials are considering retail brokerage Robinhood's top lawyer, as well as bank regulators and corporate attorneys, for a short list of key financial agency heads they expect to present to the president-elect soon, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter.Among those being considered for chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission is Dan Gallagher, a Republican SEC commissioner from 2011 to 2015 who is currently chief legal and compliance officer at Robinhood, the people said.Gallagher, who is a popular pick among cryptocurrency executives who donated millions of dollars to Donald Trump's Republican campaign, is the front-runner at this point, although the discussions are fluid, two of the people said.Also in the mix for SEC chair is Paul Atkins, another former Republican SEC commissioner and CEO of consultancy Patomak Global Partners. Atkins served on Trump's transition team in 2016, when he was also a contender for the SEC chair role, Reuters reported at the time.Robert Stebbins, a partner at law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher who served as SEC general counsel during Trump's first administration, is also being discussed for the SEC short list.Trump transition team officials are compiling a short list of a handful of individuals for each financial agency which they will present to Trump, said two of the people. The process could take a few weeks, and it was still too early to say who would ultimately win the top jobs, the people said.Gallagher and Atkins did not respond to requests for comment on Thursday. Stebbins declined to comment.In a statement, Karoline Leavitt, Trump's national press secretary, said: "President-Elect Trump will begin making decisions on who will serve in his second Administration soon. Those decisions will be announced when they are made."Trump's campaign courted crypto industry cash with promises to promote bitcoin and overhaul the SEC, whose Democratic chair, Gary Gensler, has cracked down hard on the industry, saying it has flouted SEC rules. Crypto companies have been pushing for an SEC chair who will quickly end his crackdown and tear up other unfriendly policies,.

▲  78 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

First Lady Feud: Melania Declines Biden Meet-Up Over Privacy Invasion

Melania Trump declined an offer to head to the White House Wednesday and meet with Jill Biden, citing the Biden administration’s raid on Mar-a-Lago as part of the federal government’s investigation into classified documents.“She ain’t going,” a source familiar with Melania’s decision told The Post. “Jill Biden’s husband authorized the FBI snooping through her underwear drawer. The Bidens are disgusting,” the source said.“Jill Biden isn’t someone Melania needs to meet,” the source added.Melania’s husband, President-elect Donald Trump, will sit with President Biden in the Oval Office Wednesday for a traditional post-election meeting.Typically, the first lady hosts her successor for tea in the White House.Melania visited the White House following her husband’s 2016 election win and received a tour from then- first lady Michelle Obama.After Trump lost his re-election bid in 2020, he failed to invite the Bidens to the White House before the Democrat officially assumed office, breaking the decades-old tradition, according to reports at the time.The Post has reached out to the Trump campaign and the White House about Melania’s decision to skip the meeting.The FBI raided Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in August 2022 in its probe of the 45th president’s withholding of classified White House documents.Melania, 54, has previously voiced her displeasure over the raid at their Palm Beach, Florida, mansion.“Yeah, it made me angry,” she said on “Fox & Friends” in a September interview, calling it an “invasion of privacy.” FBI agents scoured Melania’s wardrobe, combed through her 78-year-old husband’s office and even reportedly searched one of her son Barron’s rooms.

▲  229 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4 days4D

MAGA Purge: Trump Jr. and Carlson Slam Globalists!

Carlson and Donald Trump Jr., the president-elect’s oldest son, outlined what they said were the dangers of bringing neoconservatives into the administration—men and women, they claimed, who seek to control him, not serve him. They also argued that Pompeo had proven himself to be disloyal, the people said, pointing to Pompeo’s decision to distance himself from false claims that the 2020 election was stolen, and comments he made that the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the Capitol by Trump supporters was “unacceptable.”Within days of the election, Pompeo was out of the running. The president-elect posted on Truth Social that Pompeo and Nikki Haley, Trump’s former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, wouldn’t be landing jobs in his administration.Officials such as Haley, who challenged Trump during the Republican primary, and former national security adviser Robert O’Brien were passed over for jobs as Trump and his team looked to stock his cabinet with “fresh blood,” as one transition official put it, who have roots in the MAGA movement. The perception among some within Trump’s inner circle is that appointees such as Pompeo would follow a more conventional GOP approach to national security policy by supporting U.S. involvement in overseas conflicts, such as Ukraine, or icing out traditional adversaries, such as Russia. Pete Hegseth, a military veteran and former Fox News host whom Trump chose to lead the Pentagon, has criticized U.S. involvement in the conflict in Ukraine, and has touted a controversial view that women should be barred from combat. But Hegseth’s path to confirmation has been fraught with challenges because of a number of personal controversies.

▲  107 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4 days4D

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  199 replies2 agree